Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Physical Education Curriculum Design in India

Authors & Affiliations

* Corresponding Author. Author contact details are available in the published PDF article as per journal policy.

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into physical education (PE) curriculum design presents a transformative opportunity for the Indian school education system. This paper examines how AI-enabled approaches can address long-standing challenges in PE, including limited personalization, inconsistent assessment, low student engagement, and inequitable access to quality instruction. Drawing on contemporary pedagogical theories and national policy priorities, particularly the National Education Policy 2020, the study conceptualizes an India centric framework for AI-supported PE curriculum reform. AI applications such as adaptive learning systems, movement analysis, health and safety analytics, and assistive technologies are explored for their potential to enhance skill acquisition, monitor student well-being, and support inclusive participation across diverse learner populations. The paper also highlights the relevance of integrating indigenous sports and culturally responsive practices to ensure contextual alignment. Critical considerations related to infrastructure readiness, teacher capacity building, data ethics, and governance are discussed to ensure responsible and sustainable implementation. By positioning AI as a supportive tool rather than a replacement for teachers, the study emphasizes a balanced techno-pedagogical approach that strengthens human interaction in PE. Overall, the paper argues that thoughtfully designed AI integration can significantly improve the quality, equity, and long-term impact of physical education in India, fostering lifelong engagement in physical activity and holistic student development.

Keywords & Indexing Terms

Download Center

Indexing & Verification

ORCID Author identifier support Open Access Free reader access Indexing Ready Scholar metadata compatible OAI-PMH Metadata harvesting ready Article Metrics Views & download analytics

Article Metrics

Metrics are indicative and may update periodically after indexing, downloads and citation tracking are enabled.

Article Integrity & Transparency

License & Copyright

Copyright © 2025 International Journal of Physical Education, Sports, Health and Nutrition. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License . Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.

How to Cite

PDF Preview

If the PDF preview does not load on your device, open the PDF directly or use the Download PDF button. Open PDF in new tab

Declarations

Publisher's Note

References

Showing first 3 references. Click “Show All References” to view complete list.

1. 1. Liu, M., & Bu, J. (2021). Deep integration of physical health education based on intelligent communication technology. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2021, Article 4323043. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8460374/
2. 2. Aliabadi, R., Singh, A., & Wilson, E. (2023). Transdisciplinary AI education: The confluence of curricular and community needs in the instruction of artificial intelligence. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.14702
3. 3. Iyer, P., & Debang, M. (2023). The future of adaptive e-learning: Trends and directions. OSF Preprints. https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/xs78z/
4. 4. Deng, C., Yu, Q., Luo, G., Zhao, Z., & Li, Y. (2022). Big data-driven intelligent governance of college students’ physical health: System and strategy. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, Article 924025. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9405426/
5. 5. Renuga Devi, C., & Sarkar, R. (2019). Assistive technology for educating persons with intellectual disability. European Journal of Special Education Research, 4(3), 121–132. https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejse/article/view/2487
6. 6. Sambasivan, N., Arnesen, E., Hutchinson, B., Doshi, T., & Prabhakaran, V. (2021). Re-imagining algorithmic fairness in India and beyond. In FAccT ’21: ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 315–328). ACM. https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.09995
7. 7. Wang, X., & Liu, Z. (2022). Three-dimensional reconstruction of national traditional sports cultural heritage based on feature clustering and artificial intelligence. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2022, Article 8159045. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9477573/
8. 8. Li, S., Wang, C., & Wang, Y. (2024). Fuzzy evaluation model for physical education teaching methods in colleges and universities using artificial intelligence. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 4312. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-53177-y
9. 9. Yu, L., & Yu, Z. (2023). Qualitative and quantitative analyses of artificial intelligence ethics in education using VOSviewer and CitNetExplorer. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1061778. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10035335/
10. 10. Latham, A., & Goltz, S. (2019). A survey of the general public’s views on the ethics of using AI in education. In S. Isotani, E. Millán, A. Ogan, P. Hastings, B. McLaren, & R. Luckin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES '19) (pp. 408–414). Association for Computing Machinery. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworkspost2013/6512/
11. 11. Lakkaraju, K., Khandelwal, V., Srivastava, B., Agostinelli, F., Tang, H., Singh, P., Wu, D., Irvin, M., & Kundu, A. (2024). Trust and ethical considerations in a multi-modal, explainable AI-driven chatbot tutoring system: The case of collaboratively solving Rubik's Cube. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01760. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01760
12. 12. Yang, R., & Lin, H. (2022). Evaluation of the quality of football teaching in colleges and universities based on artificial neural networks. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, Article 8001252. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9166992/
13. 13. Yu, L., & Yu, Z. (2023). Qualitative and quantitative analyses of artificial intelligence ethics in education using VOSviewer and CitNetExplorer. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(6), 4976. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10035335/
14. 14. Latham, A., & Goltz, S. (2019). A survey of the general public’s views on the ethics of using AI in education. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp. 408–414). https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314231
15. 15. Lakkaraju, K., Khandelwal, V., Srivastava, B., Agostinelli, F., Tang, H., Singh, P., Wu, D., Irvin, M., & Kundu, A. (2024). Trust and ethical considerations in a multi-modal, explainable AI-driven chatbot tutoring system: The case of collaboratively solving Rubik’s Cube. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01760
16. 16. Yang, R., & Lin, H. (2022). Evaluation of the quality of football teaching in colleges and universities based on artificial neural networks. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, Article 5025729. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9166992/

Related Articles